|
Size: 2222
Comment:
|
Size: 2267
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 14: | Line 14: |
| ||4 ||04 October '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w4 |Bayes factor (Florian)]] || | ||4 ||04 October '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w4 |Bayes factor (Florian) + Lindsay's information structure experiment]] || |
HLP Lab Corpus Group Meeting Schedule
Autumn Semester '11
Tuesdays at 10:30am
Week |
Date |
Topic |
1 |
13 September '11 |
Organizational Meeting |
2 |
20 September '11 |
|
3 |
27 September '11 |
|
4 |
04 October '11 |
Bayes factor (Florian) + Lindsay's information structure experiment |
5 |
11 October '11 |
|
6 |
18 October '11 |
|
7 |
25 October '11 |
|
8 |
01 November '11 |
MacWhinney '01, Jones and Love '11, McClelland '01, Griffiths '01 (Esteban) |
9 |
08 November '11 |
|
10 |
15 November '11 |
Individual differences in statistical learning (Masha, Thomas) |
11 |
22 November '11 |
Exemplar based Johnson '97, Pierhumbert '01/'02 (Dave) and case marker (Chigusa) |
12 |
29 November '11 |
|
13 |
06 December '11 |
|
14 |
13 December '11 |
|
15 |
20 December '11 |
Suggestions
(Florian) kass and raftery 95 summarize jeffreys 35 and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).