Differences between revisions 2 and 3

HLP Lab Corpus Group Meeting Schedule

Autumn Semester '11

Week	Date	Topic
1	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w1 TBA]
2	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w2 TBA]
3	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w3 TBA]
4	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w4 TBA]
5	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w5 TBA]
6	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w6 TBA]
7	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w7 TBA]
8	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w8 TBA]
9	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w9 TBA]
10	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w10 TBA]
11	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w11 TBA]
12	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w12 TBA]
13	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w13 TBA]
14	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w14 TBA]
15	dd Month 11	[wiki:HlpLab/Labmeeting/AU11w15 TBA]

(Florian) [attachment:KassRaftery95_BayesFactorOverview.pdf kass and raftery 95] summarize [attachment:Jeffreys1935_Bayes_factor-evidence_for_theories.pdf jeffreys 35] and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).

-  ⇤ ← Revision 2 as of 2011-06-15 16:12:32 → 
  Size: 2238
  Editor: echidna
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 3 as of 2011-06-15 16:14:40 → ⇥
  Size: 2236
  Editor: echidna
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 29:
- * (Florian) [attachment:KassRaftery95_BayesFactorOverview.pdf kass and raftery 95] summarize [attachment:Jeffreys1935_Bayes factor - evidence for theories.pdf jeffreys 35] and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).
+ * (Florian) [attachment:KassRaftery95_BayesFactorOverview.pdf kass and raftery 95] summarize [attachment:Jeffreys1935_Bayes_factor-evidence_for_theories.pdf jeffreys 35] and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).