#acl HlpLabGroup:read,write,delete,revert,admin All:read
#format wiki
#pragma section-numbers 4
#language en

= HLP Lab Corpus Group Meeting Schedule =
== Autumn Semester '11 ==
=== Tuesdays at 10:30am ===

||'''Week'''  ||'''Date'''      ||'''Topic'''                                    ||
||1           ||13 September '11 ||Organizational Meeting                        ||
||2           ||20 September '11 ||ETAP-2 (poster-Sarah)                         ||
||3           ||27 September '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w3 |Sumner + Babel (Dave)]]   ||
||4           ||04 October '11   ||Meghan Sumner talk in Kresge room (Mel269)  ||
||5           ||11 October '11   ||Esteban's NSF proposal + Lindsay's experiment designs||
||6           ||18 October '11   ||[[LabmeetingAU11w6 |Masha's new research idea + Jenny]]||
||7           ||25 October '11   ||[[LabmeetingAU11w7 |Sarah Brown-Schmidt (Sarah Bibyk)]]||
||8           ||01 November '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w8 |MacWhinney '01, Jones and Love '11, McClelland '01, Griffiths '01 (Esteban)]]||
||9           ||08 November '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w9 |Model of language acquisition (Ting)]]||
||10          ||15 November '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w10 |Case marker (Chigusa)]]||
||11          ||22 November '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w11|Exemplar based Johnson '97, Pierhumbert '01/'02 (Dave)]]||
||12          ||29 November '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w12 |TBA]]                    ||
||13          ||06 December '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w13|Mouse Movements (Thomas)]]||
||14          ||13 December '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w14 |TBA]]                    ||
||15          ||20 December '11  ||[[LabmeetingAU11w15| TBA]]                    ||


== To be rescheduled ==
 * Bayes factor (Florian)
 * Chigusa's experiment
 * Individual differences in statistical learning (Masha, Thomas)

== Suggestions ==
 * (Florian) [[attachment:KassRaftery95_BayesFactorOverview.pdf |kass and raftery 95]] summarize [[attachment:Jeffreys1935_Bayes_factor-evidence_for_theories.pdf |jeffreys 35]] and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).