Differences between revisions 14 and 15
Revision 14 as of 2013-09-24 14:11:53
Size: 3060
Editor: wifi
Comment:
Revision 15 as of 2013-09-24 14:12:29
Size: 3119
Editor: wifi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 35: Line 35:
== Possible topics == 
== Possible topics ==
Line 42: Line 43:
 * Particle filters and rational process models tutorial

HLP Lab Meeting Schedule

Autumn Semester '13

Tuesdays at 1:00pm

Week

Date

Topic

1

17 Sep 13

Organizational Meeting

2

24 Sep 13

Perfors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)

3

01 Oct 13

Masha project proposal

4

08 Oct 13

NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)

5

15 Oct 13

NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)

6

22 Oct 13

Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)

7

29 Oct 13

Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker)

8

05 Nov 13

Masha practice talk

9

12 Nov 13

Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)

10

19 Nov 13

CUNY drafts

11

26 Nov 13

Thanksgiving week - No meeting

12

03 Dec 13

TBA

13

10 Dec 13

TBA

14

17 Dec 13

TBA

Possible readings

  • Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)

  • Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)

  • Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
  • Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)

  • Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
  • Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012) (she's coming for a colloquium Oct 23)

  • Reinisch, E., & Holt, L. L. (in press). Lexically-guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. (Dave; expands on Kraljic & Samuel papers on generalization across talkers)

Possible topics

  • Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)

  • Audio-visual speech processing
  • The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
  • Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
  • Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
  • Particle filters and rational process models tutorial

LabMeetingAU13 (last edited 2013-11-05 18:16:26 by wifiguest)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux