|
Size: 2717
Comment:
|
Size: 2779
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 12: | Line 12: |
| ||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|TBA]] || ||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|TBA]] || ||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|TBA]] || ||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|TBA]] || ||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|TBA]] || ||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|TBA]] || ||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|TBA]] || ||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|TBA]] || ||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|TBA]] || ||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w11|TBA]] || |
||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)]]|| ||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|Masha project proposal]] || ||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]|| ||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]|| ||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)]] || ||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker) ]] || ||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|Masha practice talk]] || ||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)]]|| ||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|CUNY drafts ]] || ||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||Thanksgiving week - No meeting || |
HLP Lab Meeting Schedule
Autumn Semester '13
Tuesdays at 1:00pm
Week |
Date |
Topic |
1 |
17 Sep 13 |
|
2 |
24 Sep 13 |
|
3 |
01 Oct 13 |
|
4 |
08 Oct 13 |
|
5 |
15 Oct 13 |
|
6 |
22 Oct 13 |
|
7 |
29 Oct 13 |
|
8 |
05 Nov 13 |
|
9 |
12 Nov 13 |
|
10 |
19 Nov 13 |
|
11 |
26 Nov 13 |
Thanksgiving week - No meeting |
12 |
03 Dec 13 |
|
13 |
10 Dec 13 |
|
14 |
17 Dec 13 |
Possible readings
Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)
Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)
- Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)
- Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
- The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
- Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
- Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012)
Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)
- Audio-visual speech processing
- ADD SOMETHING HERE
- TOPICS ARE GOOD