Differences between revisions 1 and 2
Revision 1 as of 2016-10-31 13:11:02
Size: 450
Editor: dhcp-10-5-5-254
Comment:
Revision 2 as of 2016-11-22 05:44:22
Size: 1408
Editor: 8
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 23: Line 23:
 1. '''Reviewed''' a paper for Cognition.
 1. '''Set up''' some audio and visual stimuli to send to the SR guy in advance of his visit to UR, for our eventual kid eye-tracking needs.
 1. '''Caught up''' on some much needed data reports on my kid data, started working on the paper.
 1. '''Encouraged''' Wes to finish setting up his study / running kids in the new version of his task in time for the CUNY deadline.
 1. '''Designed''' and '''ran''' new versions of my contextual manipulation studies to try to get participants to explain away speaker variability to various aspects of the context rather than to the speaker herself. To be submitted to CUNY.
 1. Started '''drafting''' or '''editing''' CUNY abstracts for the above mentioned tasks.
 1. Tried to elicit uncertainty markings by asking people to read some carrier sentences either in the presence or without the presence of ambiguous information. Thought about prosody. Thought about js.

Lab Meeting, Autumn 2016, Week 14

Awe- and Aw-inspiring readings (or just stuff you think deserves a mention)

What we did over last week

Florian

Xin

Andrew

Jenn

Dan

Amanda

  1. Reviewed a paper for Cognition.

  2. Set up some audio and visual stimuli to send to the SR guy in advance of his visit to UR, for our eventual kid eye-tracking needs.

  3. Caught up on some much needed data reports on my kid data, started working on the paper.

  4. Encouraged Wes to finish setting up his study / running kids in the new version of his task in time for the CUNY deadline.

  5. Designed and ran new versions of my contextual manipulation studies to try to get participants to explain away speaker variability to various aspects of the context rather than to the speaker herself. To be submitted to CUNY.

  6. Started drafting or editing CUNY abstracts for the above mentioned tasks.

  7. Tried to elicit uncertainty markings by asking people to read some carrier sentences either in the presence or without the presence of ambiguous information. Thought about prosody. Thought about js.

Zach

Linda

Wednesday

Shaorong

LabmeetingAU16w14 (last edited 2016-12-01 16:08:23 by slate)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux