Differences between revisions 8 and 9
Revision 8 as of 2017-03-06 19:39:40
Size: 1687
Editor: wifi
Comment:
Revision 9 as of 2017-03-06 19:40:13
Size: 1369
Editor: wifi
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 27: Line 27:

---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ----
 1. Replotted my data for all of my studies to look at the data by 1) which speaker the listeners thought was better, and 2) whether or not participants actually chose the intended referent in our contextually supportive trials. Found some fun things, now know a lot more about my data.
 1. Turned in 2 Cog Sci reviews.
 1. Worked on my lunch talk.
 1. Met with Andres.
 1. Finished grading BCS 111 exams.
Line 36: Line 39:
---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ----
 1. Replotted my data for all of my studies to look at the data by 1) which speaker the listeners thought was better, and 2) whether or not participants actually chose the intended referent in our contextually supportive trials. Found some fun things, now know a lot more about my data.
 1. Turned in 2 Cog Sci reviews.

---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ----

---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - other version:''' ----

---- /!\ '''Edit conflict - your version:''' ----
 1. Worked on my lunch talk.
 1. Met with Andres.
 1. Finished grading BCS 111 exams.

=== Zach ===

---- /!\ '''End of edit conflict''' ----

Lab Meeting, Spring 2017, Week 8

Awe- and Aw-inspiring readings (or just stuff you think deserves a mention)

Good news, everybody! We can stop using the exact same plots from the Lisker & Abrahamson paper when talking about the need for adaptation! The Pierrrehumbert episodic memory paper had this great plot from German et al., 2013 german_2013.png ZB

What we did over last week

Florian

Xin

Andrew

  1. Several small web page updates requested by Florian
  2. Cleaned up my work computer Desktop, which was becoming *embarrassing*

Jenn

Dan

Amanda

  1. Replotted my data for all of my studies to look at the data by 1) which speaker the listeners thought was better, and 2) whether or not participants actually chose the intended referent in our contextually supportive trials. Found some fun things, now know a lot more about my data.
  2. Turned in 2 Cog Sci reviews.
  3. Worked on my lunch talk.
  4. Met with Andres.
  5. Finished grading BCS 111 exams.

Zach

1. Quals quals quals 2. Class class class 3. Figuring out CMCL travel details and booking stuff, etc.

Linda

Wednesday

Shaorong

LabmeetingSP17w8 (last edited 2017-03-09 17:47:40 by slate)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux