Differences between revisions 4 and 5
Revision 4 as of 2017-03-11 04:02:31
Size: 1300
Comment:
Revision 5 as of 2017-03-12 04:20:19
Size: 1580
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 24: Line 24:
   * Chigusa's project with Meredith and Mike. Did a wee lil' ideal observer analysis
   * Initial analysis of Rachel Smith's data. Got my GAMM on.
Line 30: Line 32:
  1. Mr. Burchill's quals and 27-thousand answers to his many questions. And I'm not even exaggerating. Not at all. Not at all.

Lab Meeting, TERM YYYY, Week XX

Awe- and Aw-inspiring readings (or just stuff you think deserves a mention)

  • For our accent adaptation studies, we might want to do some form of pre-test before "exposure": Wanrooij, Escudero, and Raijmakers (2013) find that certain differences in pre-test performance correlate with how well the listeners adapt in interesting ways. In essence, that people who are attending the right things in the beginning benefit from training. They also use something called "latent class regression" that seems like it could be cool. ZB

What we did over last week

Florian

  • Research
    1. To-do

      • ...
    2. Planning

      • ...
    3. Writing

      • ...
    4. Feedback on

      • CUNY dry runs x 2
      • Chigusa's project with Meredith and Mike. Did a wee lil' ideal observer analysis
      • Initial analysis of Rachel Smith's data. Got my GAMM on.
  • Logistics:
    1. no updates.
  • Service:
    1. Meetings with Job candidates.
    2. Editing: one editorial letter for Linguistic Typology

    3. Letters: 0.

    4. Mr. Burchill's quals and 27-thousand answers to his many questions. And I'm not even exaggerating. Not at all. Not at all.

Xin

Andrew

Jenn

Dan

Amanda

Zach

Linda

Wednesday

Shaorong

LabmeetingSP17w9 (last edited 2017-03-21 15:16:44 by FlorianJaeger)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux