Differences between revisions 15 and 19 (spanning 4 versions)
Revision 15 as of 2011-10-28 15:30:08
Size: 2277
Editor: echidna
Comment:
Revision 19 as of 2011-11-15 17:26:12
Size: 2276
Editor: wireless
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 20: Line 20:
||10 ||15 November '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w10 |Individual differences in statistical learning (Masha, Thomas)]]||
||11 ||22 November '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w11| Exemplar based Johnson '97, Pierhumbert '01/'02 (Dave) and case marker (Chigusa)]]||
||10 ||15 November '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w10 |Case marker (Chigusa)]]||
||11 ||22 November '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w11|Exemplar based Johnson '97, Pierhumbert '01/'02 (Dave)]]||
Line 23: Line 23:
||13 ||06 December '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w13| TBA]]                    || ||13 ||06 December '11 ||[[LabmeetingAU11w13|Mouse Movements (Thomas)]]||
Line 31: Line 31:
 * Individual differences in statistical learning (Masha, Thomas)

HLP Lab Corpus Group Meeting Schedule

Autumn Semester '11

Tuesdays at 10:30am

Week

Date

Topic

1

13 September '11

Organizational Meeting

2

20 September '11

ETAP-2 (poster-Sarah)

3

27 September '11

Sumner + Babel (Dave)

4

04 October '11

Meghan Sumner talk in Kresge room (Mel269)

5

11 October '11

Esteban's NSF proposal + Lindsay's experiment designs

6

18 October '11

Masha's new research idea + Jenny

7

25 October '11

Sarah Brown-Schmidt (Sarah Bibyk)

8

01 November '11

MacWhinney '01, Jones and Love '11, McClelland '01, Griffiths '01 (Esteban)

9

08 November '11

Model of language acquisition (Ting)

10

15 November '11

Case marker (Chigusa)

11

22 November '11

Exemplar based Johnson '97, Pierhumbert '01/'02 (Dave)

12

29 November '11

TBA

13

06 December '11

Mouse Movements (Thomas)

14

13 December '11

TBA

15

20 December '11

TBA

To be rescheduled

  • Bayes factor (Florian)
  • Chigusa's experiment
  • Individual differences in statistical learning (Masha, Thomas)

Suggestions

  • (Florian) kass and raftery 95 summarize jeffreys 35 and other approaches to the question: how can we evaluate how much evidence there is for a theory? I don't recommend the original article. it's very mathy, but i am attaching it. the summary article is very highly cited (over 3000 times).

LabMeetingAU11 (last edited 2011-11-15 17:26:12 by wireless)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux