Differences between revisions 1 and 10 (spanning 9 versions)

HLP Lab Meeting Schedule

Autumn Semester '13

Tuesdays at 1:00pm

Week	Date	Topic
1	17 Sep 13	Organizational Meeting
2	24 Sep 13	Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)
3	01 Oct 13	Masha project proposal
4	08 Oct 13	NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)
5	15 Oct 13	NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)
6	22 Oct 13	Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)
7	29 Oct 13	Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker)
8	05 Nov 13	Masha practice talk
9	12 Nov 13	Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)
10	19 Nov 13	CUNY drafts
11	26 Nov 13	Thanksgiving week - No meeting
12	03 Dec 13	TBA
13	10 Dec 13	TBA
14	17 Dec 13	TBA

Possible readings

Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)
Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)
Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)
Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012)
Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)
Audio-visual speech processing
ADD SOMETHING HERE
TOPICS ARE GOOD

-  ⇤ ← Revision 1 as of 2013-09-10 14:35:39 → 
  Size: 1447
  Editor: echidna
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 10 as of 2013-09-17 17:50:24 → ⇥
  Size: 2779
  Editor: wireless
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 12:
-||2           ||24 Sep 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|TBA]]                     ||
||3           ||01 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|TBA]]                     ||
||4           ||08 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|TBA]]                     ||
||5           ||15 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|TBA]]                     ||
||6           ||22 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|TBA]]                     ||
||7           ||29 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|TBA]]                     ||
||8           ||05 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|TBA]]                     ||
||9           ||12 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|TBA]]                     ||
||10          ||19 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|TBA]]                    ||
||11          ||26 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w11|TBA]]                    ||
+||2           ||24 Sep 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)]]||
||3           ||01 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|Masha project proposal]]  ||
||4           ||08 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]||
||5           ||15 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]||
||6           ||22 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)]] ||
||7           ||29 Oct 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|Dikker & Pylkkänen  (Ilker) ]] ||
||8           ||05 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|Masha practice talk]]     ||
||9           ||12 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)]]||
||10          ||19 Nov 13       ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|CUNY drafts ]]           ||
||11          ||26 Nov 13       ||Thanksgiving week - No meeting               ||
 Line 25:
+== Possible readings ==

 * Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)
 * Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)
 * Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
 * Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)
 * Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
 * The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
 * Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
 * Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
 * Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012)
 * Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)
 * Audio-visual speech processing
 * ADD SOMETHING HERE
 * TOPICS ARE GOOD