Differences between revisions 1 and 13 (spanning 12 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2013-09-10 14:35:39
Size: 1447
Editor: echidna
Comment:
Revision 13 as of 2013-09-17 18:04:24
Size: 2832
Editor: wifiguest
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 12: Line 12:
||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|TBA]] ||
||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|TBA]] ||
||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|TBA]] ||
||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|TBA]] ||
||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|TBA]] ||
||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|TBA]] ||
||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|TBA]] ||
||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|TBA]] ||
||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|TBA]] ||
||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w11|TBA]] ||
||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[attachment:perfors tenenbaum regier 2011 cogn.pdf|Perfors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)]] ||
||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|Masha project proposal]] ||
||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]||
||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]||
||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)]] ||
||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker) ]] ||
||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|Masha practice talk]] ||
||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[attachment:Gonzales_Lotto_2013.pdf|Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)]]||
||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|CUNY drafts ]] ||
||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||Thanksgiving week - No meeting ||
Line 25: Line 25:

== Possible readings ==

 * Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)
 * Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)
 * Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
 * Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)
 * Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
 * The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
 * Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
 * Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
 * Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012)
 * Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)
 * Audio-visual speech processing
 * ADD SOMETHING HERE
 * TOPICS ARE GOOD

HLP Lab Meeting Schedule

Autumn Semester '13

Tuesdays at 1:00pm

Week

Date

Topic

1

17 Sep 13

Organizational Meeting

2

24 Sep 13

Perfors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)

3

01 Oct 13

Masha project proposal

4

08 Oct 13

NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)

5

15 Oct 13

NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)

6

22 Oct 13

Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)

7

29 Oct 13

Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker)

8

05 Nov 13

Masha practice talk

9

12 Nov 13

Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)

10

19 Nov 13

CUNY drafts

11

26 Nov 13

Thanksgiving week - No meeting

12

03 Dec 13

TBA

13

10 Dec 13

TBA

14

17 Dec 13

TBA

Possible readings

  • Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)

  • Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)

  • Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
  • Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)

  • Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
  • The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
  • Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
  • Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
  • Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012)

  • Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)

  • Audio-visual speech processing
  • ADD SOMETHING HERE
  • TOPICS ARE GOOD

LabMeetingAU13 (last edited 2013-11-05 18:16:26 by wifiguest)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux