|
Size: 2141
Comment:
|
← Revision 21 as of 2013-11-05 18:16:26 ⇥
Size: 3639
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 12: | Line 12: |
| ||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w2|TBA]] || ||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|TBA]] || ||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|TBA]] || ||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|TBA]] || ||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|TBA]] || ||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|TBA]] || ||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|TBA]] || ||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|TBA]] || ||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|TBA]] || ||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w11|TBA]] || ||12 ||03 Dec 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w12|TBA]] || ||13 ||10 Dec 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w13|TBA]] || |
||2 ||24 Sep 13 ||[[attachment:perfors tenenbaum regier 2011 cogn.pdf|Perfors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (Klinton)]] || ||3 ||01 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w3|Masha project proposal]] || ||4 ||08 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w4|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]|| ||5 ||15 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w5|NRSA discussion (Sarah, Esteban, Dave)]]|| ||6 ||22 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w6|Dave NRSA discussion / Dikker & Pylkkänen (Ilker)]] || ||7 ||29 Oct 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w7|Visitor's presentation]] || ||8 ||05 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w8|Masha practice talk]] || ||9 ||12 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w9|Scott presentation / Quantifiers discussion (Ilker)]]|| ||10 ||19 Nov 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w10|CUNY drafts]] || ||11 ||26 Nov 13 ||Thanksgiving week - No meeting || ||12 ||03 Dec 13 ||[[LabmeetingAU13w12|Scott practice talk]] || ||13 ||10 Dec 13 ||[[attachment:Gonzales_Lotto_2013.pdf|Gonzales & Lotto (Bozena & Dave)]] || |
| Line 28: | Line 28: |
| * Ahissar & Hochstein (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. TiCS. * Hochstein & Ahissar (2002). View from the Top: Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System. Neuron. * Ahissar et al. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. |
|
| Line 33: | Line 36: |
| * ADD SOMETHING HERE * TOPICS ARE GOOD |
* Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012) (she's coming for a colloquium Oct 23) * Reinisch, E., & Holt, L. L. (in press). Lexically-guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. (Dave; expands on Kraljic & Samuel papers on generalization across talkers) * van de Schoot et al. (2013). A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research. Child Development. == Possible topics == * Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013) * Audio-visual speech processing * The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave) * Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave) * Models of sensory adaptation in other domains * Particle filters and rational process models tutorial |
HLP Lab Meeting Schedule
Autumn Semester '13
Tuesdays at 1:00pm
Week |
Date |
Topic |
1 |
17 Sep 13 |
|
2 |
24 Sep 13 |
|
3 |
01 Oct 13 |
|
4 |
08 Oct 13 |
|
5 |
15 Oct 13 |
|
6 |
22 Oct 13 |
|
7 |
29 Oct 13 |
|
8 |
05 Nov 13 |
|
9 |
12 Nov 13 |
|
10 |
19 Nov 13 |
|
11 |
26 Nov 13 |
Thanksgiving week - No meeting |
12 |
03 Dec 13 |
|
13 |
10 Dec 13 |
|
14 |
17 Dec 13 |
Possible readings
Ahissar & Hochstein (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. TiCS.
Hochstein & Ahissar (2002). View from the Top: Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System. Neuron.
- Ahissar et al. (2009). Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B.
Gonzales & Lotto (2013). A bafri, un pafri: Bilinguals’ Pseudoword Identifications Support Language-Specific Phonetic Systems. Psychological Science. (Bozena)
Pefors, Tenenbaum, & Regier (2011). The learnability of abstract syntactic principles. Cognition. (Klinton)
- Hickok (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. (Klinton)
Dikker & Pylkkänen (In press). Predicting language: MEG evidence for lexical preactivation. Brain and Language. (Klinton)
- Vandeberg et al. (2013). Detecting cognitive interactions through eye movement transitions. JML. (Klinton)
Lori Holt papers on low-level perceptual adaptation (e.g. Laing et al. 2012; Huang & Holt, 2012) (she's coming for a colloquium Oct 23)
Reinisch, E., & Holt, L. L. (in press). Lexically-guided phonetic retuning of foreign-accented speech and its generalization. (Dave; expands on Kraljic & Samuel papers on generalization across talkers)
- van de Schoot et al. (2013). A Gentle Introduction to Bayesian Analysis: Applications to Developmental Research. Child Development.
Possible topics
Semi-supervised learning, possibly connected to phonetic adaptation (e.g. Cheyenne Munson's dissertation experiments; Zhu, Rogers, Qian et al. 2007; Lake & McClelland, 2010; Feldman 2013)
- Audio-visual speech processing
- The extent and nature of within vs. between talker variability in different phonetic cues/categories (Dave)
- Model adaptation vs. normalization in automatic speech recognition systems (Dave)
- Models of sensory adaptation in other domains
- Particle filters and rational process models tutorial