Differences between revisions 4 and 5

Lab Meeting, Fall 2016, Week 5

If you haven't already, pls read/skim Bicknell et al. (under review).

Awe- and Aw-inspiring readings (or just stuff you think deserves a mention)

Edited Hall et al. after we had sent out a draft to, and received feedback from, tens of researchers. I'm glad we did that, btw. There were at least three instances where we would have really screwed something, and likely would have pissed off reviewers.
Class prep for BCS 152 and DSC 530.
More post-doc interviewing and letter reading.
Letters of recommendation: 3
On my list:
- Wednesday's introduction to her paper.
- Esteban's draft of his thesis Ch. 4 write-up for publication.

Showed Jenn some wiki basics, like how to instantiate one of these week templates
Nearly ready for annual fall RSRB amendment adding and removing people
Worked on CrowdExp TODO list

-  ⇤ ← Revision 4 as of 2016-09-23 19:14:23 → 
  Size: 869
  Editor: slate
  Comment:
+   ← Revision 5 as of 2016-09-24 20:06:43 → ⇥
  Size: 1404
  Editor: FlorianJaeger
  Comment:
-Deletions are marked like this.
+Additions are marked like this.
 Line 15:
+. '''Edited''' Hall et al. after we had sent out a draft to, and received feedback from, tens of researchers. I'm glad we did that, btw. There were at least three instances where we would have really screwed something, and likely would have pissed off reviewers. 
 1. Class prep for BCS 152 and DSC 530.
 1. More post-doc interviewing and letter reading. 
 1. '''Letters of recommendation:''' 3
 1. '''On my list:'''
  * Wednesday's introduction to her paper.
  * Esteban's draft of his thesis Ch. 4 write-up for publication.