Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2015-08-19 15:57:25
Size: 1204
Editor: 128
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2015-08-19 15:57:37
Size: 1209
Editor: 128
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 10: Line 10:
 * Grabski, K., Tremblay, P., Gracco, V. L., Girin, L., & Sato, M. (2013). A mediating role of the auditory dorsal pathway in selective adaptation to speech: A state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Research, 1515, 55–65. [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.024|doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.024]]. TMS applied at the onset of categorization stimulus after adaptation. Appears to show big enhancement of adaptation effects in TMS conditions vs. shame, but '''really''' under powered (n=12) and difference only shows up when you look at the second half of adaptation session (and even then it's entirely driven by ''absence'' of adaptation in sham condition). So probably crap.  * Grabski, K., Tremblay, P., Gracco, V. L., Girin, L., & Sato, M. (2013). A mediating role of the auditory dorsal pathway in selective adaptation to speech: A state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Research, 1515, 55–65. [[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.024|doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.024]]. TMS applied at the onset of categorization stimulus after adaptation. Appears to show big enhancement of adaptation effects in TMS conditions vs. shame, but '''really''' under powered (n=12) and difference only shows up when you look at the second half of adaptation session (and even then it's entirely driven by ''absence'' of adaptation in sham condition). So probably crap. -DFK

Lab Meeting, Summer 2015, Week 16

Awe- and Aw-inspiring readings (or just stuff you think deserves a mention)

  • Grabski, K., Tremblay, P., Gracco, V. L., Girin, L., & Sato, M. (2013). A mediating role of the auditory dorsal pathway in selective adaptation to speech: A state-dependent transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain Research, 1515, 55–65. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.03.024. TMS applied at the onset of categorization stimulus after adaptation. Appears to show big enhancement of adaptation effects in TMS conditions vs. shame, but really under powered (n=12) and difference only shows up when you look at the second half of adaptation session (and even then it's entirely driven by absence of adaptation in sham condition). So probably crap. -DFK

What we did over last week

Florian

Chigusa

Andrew

Olga

Esteban

Dave

Sarah

Dan

Amanda

Zach

Linda

Maryam

LabmeetingSU15w16 (last edited 2015-08-24 15:52:42 by 128)

MoinMoin Appliance - Powered by TurnKey Linux