#acl HlpLabGroup:read,write,delete,revert,admin All:read #format wiki #pragma section-numbers 3 #language en = Redundancy and Syntactic Reduction = This is a series of corpus-based studies and production experiments on syntactic reduction and too what extent it is driven by redundancy/information density/predictability. Please follow the links below for more information -- some may be only accessible to HLP lab members or HLP lab guests. * '''Non-subject-extracted relative clauses (NSRCs)''' * Corpus studies: * Jaeger (2006 -- my thesis) * [[http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/fjaeger/papers/http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/fjaeger/papers/JaegerWasow06_BLS.pdf|Jaeger and Wasow (2006)]] * [[http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/fjaeger/papers/WasowJaegerOrrDGfSpaper.pdf|Wasow et al. (2009)]] * Experiments: * [[ProjectsSyntacticReductionORCreductionExperiments|Recall, completion, and forced-choice preference experiments on ''that''-omission in object-extracted relative clauses]] in collaboration with Roger Levy and Vic Ferreira at UCSD. * '''Complement clauses (CCs)''' * Corpus studies: * [[http://www.bcs.rochester.edu/people/fjaeger/papers/Jaeger09UIDcomplementizers.pdf|Jaeger (submitted)]]. * '''Reduction of subject-extracted relative clauses (SRCs)''' * Corpus studies: * [[ProjectsSyntacticReductionSRCreduction|Reduction of passive SRCs in the BNC]]\ (so called ''whiz''-deletion). Also, feel free to have a look at the [wiki:/Annotation annotation guidelines for the studies on subject-extracted passive relative clauses in the British National Corpus]. * Tom Wasow also has done some studies on ''that''-omission in subject-extracted relative clauses in non-standard English (not the same as ''whiz''-deletion), which are summarized in the presentation we gave at the International Relative Conference, Cambridge, September 2007. * ''' ''to''-omission after the verb ''help'' ''': There is some preliminary data, which I presented in some invited talks. Let me know if you want more information.